Tuesday, October 18, 2011

The Big Uglies: Big Ten linemen in the NFL (posted 10.18.11)

The Big Uglies: Who's Producing NFL Linemen in the Big Ten? 
Is Wisconsin's reputation as an offensive linemen factory fact or fiction?

Penn State recruiting followers were despondent at the news this week that a highly regarded offensive line prospect had de-committed from Penn State and instead committed to Wisconsin.

In general, the apparent loss of 2012 recruit J.J. Denman was viewed with a mix of angst and resignation: "Well, they are Wisconsin, so who can blame a kid of wanting to go there? They crank out the NFL linemen."

(By the way, whatever happened to Big Ten schools respecting verbal commitments to other Big Ten schools?)

On one of the college football TV shows this week, an announcer declared that Wisconsin churns out first round picks on the offensive line "year after year.''

Really? RFBS' memory bank could only name two Wisconsin OLs in recent years who were first round picks (Joe Thomas, Gabe Carimi), and could not name another Badger OL product currently in the NFL.

Which got RFBS wondering: Who in the Big Ten actually is churning out the most Big Uglies for the League? In a conference renowned for producing offensive lineman, which is the premier school? Is it Wisconsin? Michigan? Nebraska? Ohio State?

Guess again. The clear-cut No. 1 is ... Iowa.


And the Hawkeyes don't just win in quantity, but quality: RT Bryan Bulaga started as a rookie for the Packers run to the Super Bowl last season; G Robert Gallery, G Eric Steinbach and C Casey Wiegmann started a combined 399 games entering the season; and G Marshal Yanda of the Ravens is rated the fifth-best guard in the NFL by ESPN's Scouts Inc.

Penn State's four NFL lineman consist of three solid starters - RT Kareem McKenzie (11th season, Giants), LT Levi Brown (5th season, Cardinals) and LG Stefen Wisniewski (rookie, Raiders) - along with Patriots third-year reserve G Rich Ohrnberger.

(ESPN.com is the source of the data below, which obviously is only as accurate as the most recent signings or cuts)

Big Ten linemen in the NFL
  • 8 - Iowa (Bryan Bulaga, Robert Gallery, Bryan Mattison, Seth Olsen, Eric Steinbach, Julian Vandervelde, Casey Wiegmann, Marshal Yanda)
  • 6 - Nebraska (Russ Hochstein, Richie Incognito, Lydon Murtha, Carl Nicks, Dominic Raiola, Matt Slauson)
  • 5 - Michigan (David Baas, Jeff Backus, Jonathan Goodwin, Steve Hutchinson, Jake Long)
  • 5 - Ohio State (Alex Boone, Jim Cordle, Nick Mangold, Jake McQuaide (LS), Rob Sims)
  • 5 - Wisconsin (Gabe Carimi, John Moffitt, Bill Nagy, Joe Thomas, Kraig Urbik)
  • 4 - Penn State (Levi Brown, Kareem McKenzie, Rick Ohrnberger, Stefen Wisniewski)
  • 4 - Illinois (Jon Asamoah, David Diehl, Brandon Moore, Tony Pashos)
  • 4 - Purdue (Nick Hardwick, Matt Light, Uche Nwaneri, Michael Otto)
  • 3 - Indiana (James Brewer, Kris Dielman, Rodger Saffold)
  • 2 - Northwestern (Trai Essex, Zach Strief)
  • 1 - Michigan State (Kyle Cook)
  • 0 - Minnesota
What about the future? According to Scouts Inc., at this juncture the lone Big Ten lineman projected as a first-round pick this spring is Iowa T Riley Reiff.


NOTES: Scouts Inc. rates Thomas (No. 1), Long (2) and McKenzie (6) among the Top 10 offensive tackles in the NFL. ... Nicks (3), Yanda (5), Dielman (7) and Moore (9) made the Scouts Inc. Top 10 at guard. ... Mangold is No. 1 and Hardwick No. 8 among centers. ... Minnesota's bagel is embarrassing, but Michigan State having just one is perhaps the biggest surprise. ... Rookies such as Carimi and Wisniewski (the starting left guard for the Raiders) are not yet included in the Scouts Inc. ratings.

Monday, October 17, 2011

Truths, Damn Truths and Statistics (posted 10.17.11)

Truths, Damn Truths and Statistics
Turning the old saying on its ear - there's truth to be siphoned from the numbers, if you siphon deep enough

Football is a tough game to quantify statistically, with all of its complicating variables.

For example, how do you quantify the chemistry of an entire offensive line all blocking the correct defenders on a given play? How do you account for bad route running, improper reads by a receiver and/or unblocked defenders in a quarterback's rating? Or checking to the right play, or calling the right defense, or timing a delayed blitz? Swirling gusts of wind on long passes, FGs or punts? Rain? Sleet? Snow? Hail?

So football statistics are imperfect measures. Nevertheless, the sport can produce useful stats - even if some might be compromised by the vagaries of circumstances. And for Penn State, through seven games some stats reveal what's going well, some tell where the Lions need to circle the wagons, and others reinforce what your eyes are telling you.
  • FIELD GOALS: Before Anthony Fera took over the FG duties in Game 4, PSU had made a calamitous 1-of-6 attempts. Fera is now 9-of-10, and he's perfect on PATs. With three of PSU's six wins thus far coming by six points or fewer, a steady leg from Fera is critical.
  • TACKLES FOR LOSS: Devon Still has 10, which is second in the Big Ten and an exceptional number for a defensive tackle. If Still keeps this up he could be the conference defensive player of the year.
  • PUNT TOUCHBACKS: When one school accounts for more than 1/3rd of all punt touchbacks in the conference, something is very wrong. Penn State has nine touchbacks. The other 11 teams in the Big Ten combined have 17. Nebraska and Purdue have none. The punter (Fera), the coverage units and the coaches all share in the blame and must get this remedied or PSU will succumb to bad field position
  • PENALTIES: It's not like the Lions are accumulating a lot of penalties - 44.6 yards per game, fifth-best/lowest in the conference. But PSU typically has an exceptionally low penalty rate. Also, for whatever reason, PSU opponents are committing very few penalties - 37.7 yards per game against the Lions, by far the fewest in the league. So this is the ultra-rare season where Penn State is a net loss in penalty yards.
  • INTERCEPTIONS/TURNOVERS: PSU's 11 picks are first in the Big Ten and tied for seventh nationally. Turnover margin always is one of the biggest indicators of success, and PSU is +5.
  • PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE: The Lions are yielding an exceptional 89.6 passer rating, second best in the Big Ten.
  • RUSH DEFENSE: PSU is third in the Big Ten allowing 3.0 yards per carry and 103 rush yards per game. Against the prolific attacks of Northwestern, Illinois, Nebraska and Wisconsin - all in the top 5 in the Big Ten in total offense - PSU will be relying on its defense more than ever. 
  • KICKOFF RETURNS: As long as Chaz Powell is the one returning it, PSU is in good shape. Powell has broken two long ones and is third nationally, first in the Big Ten with a 32.8 average. Devon Smith averages just 10.5 per return.
  • SCORING DEFENSE: PSU hasn't faced a murderer's row of offenses, but it's average of 11.6 points allowed per game is excellent. The three points surrendered to Iowa, which is averaging 32.5 per game, is the highlight.
  • QB RATING: Matt McGloin's is 136.0, Rob Bolden's is 85.2. Considering Bolden is not a much better runner, this discrepancy is vast. McGloin should be getting the majority of the snaps.
  • RED ZONE: More like the black 'n blue zone. When we introduced the Ultimate Red Zone Percentage last week, it illuminated PSU's struggles. The Lions 58.7 URZP is last in the Big Ten.

Saturday, October 15, 2011

POSTSCRIPT: PSU 23, Purdue 18 (posted 10.15.11)

Oct. 15 - Penn State 23, Purdue 18

There's a funny cartoon with three glasses, all filled halfway.
  • On the first glass is the word "pessimist," and the caption says "I'm half-empty.''
  • On the second glass is the word "optimist," and the caption says "I'm half-full.''
  • On the third glass is the word "realist," and the caption says "I think I'm half-filled with pee."
Penn State is 6-1 overall, 3-0 in the Big Ten and in first place in the Leaders Division. That's very good stuff. Yet the overwhelming feeling after games such as PSU's lethargic 23-18 Homecoming win over hapless Purdue is that the Lions' glass might be half-full, but it's filled with something much less than premium liquid refreshment.

Penn State football 2011 is more like a cure for enthusiasm. The Lions are rewriting the book on:
  • How to win unimpressively - can you win and drop out of the Top 25?
  • How not to strike fear - Northwestern, with four straight losses, will be a popular pick to defeat the Lions next week.
  • How to keep lame opponents in the game - Purdue was the No. 76 in the nation in the composite Massey Ratings.
Does any of that matter as long as PSU keeps winning? No, it doesn't. But can Penn State possibly keep winning while its quarterbacks play so erratically? While defenses dare the Lions to execute a balanced offense?

Winning cures all, but it doesn't always foretell a promising future.

The two QB system now must be considered permanent. Rob Bolden and Matt McGloin are who they are, and they're both going to play in every game, apparently.

Regardless, there's something confoundingly off-kilter between the quarterbacks and the play-calling. The quarterbacks play with little confidence, and frequently make bad decisions and bad throws.

And the play-calls show little confidence (repeated running calls on 2nd-and-long all season), and are very conservative (48 runs, 23 passes Saturday) and seize up in the red zone (ad nauseum).

However, there was one sequence Saturday, after Purdue cut it to 13-12 in the third quarter, where Penn State's offense looked totally awesome(!) For real. The Lions and McGloin used play-action rollout passes - imagine that! - to rip right down the field in four plays for a touchdown. A 22-yard pass, a 20-yard pass, a 9-yard pass and - with the defense softened and backpedaling - a 9-yard run. Touchdown.

Then things got more interesting: PSU did it again the next possession! McGloin hit three straight passes for 70 yards ... Alas, it was like the episode where Beavis suddenly, inexplicably, starts behaving like a genius (and freaks out Butt-head), only to revert back to form with no recollection of his spate of brilliance. On the next play McGloin threw into double coverage and was intercepted.

Bad play call? McGloin's fault? Whatever - PSU ran the ball almost every play the rest of the way.

They had suddenly started passing it all over Beaver Stadium, then a pass went awry and they reverted to the default mechanism and overcorrected back to running almost exclusively. All one way, then all the other way.

Yes, RB Silas Redd is PSU's best offensive option, and yes WR Derek Moye wasn't playing, and yes a 2-to-1 run-pass ratio actually can be a very good thing. But that's not the point. The point is the offense plays with little confidence. It doesn't have a balance, a rhythm, a theme. The opposing defense can feel it.

The PSU offense doesn't have an identity. Moments of brilliance notwithstanding.

And a potentially special season will be spoiled if that doesn't change in the next few weeks.

Friday, October 14, 2011

The Upside of Injuries: Derek Moye's broken foot

The Upside of (some) Injuries
The loss of Derek Moye could be beneficial to Penn State. Yes, beneficial.

The mysterious broken foot sustained this week by star Penn State WR Derek Moye - it happened in an apartment mishap? and will require just two weeks to heal? -  actually could have a positive effect on Penn State football.

Could. If the following occurs:
  1. If Moye's absence doesn't harm the team in the short term. The two games he'll miss are vs. Purdue and at Northwestern. PSU should win both regardless.
  2. If Moye returns fully healthy in the two-week time frame PSU has indicated, ready to go.
If those two things occur, then Moye's injury actually will help the team.

How? Because two things are certain to happen in his absence, and both are good:
  1. QB Matt McGloin will be forced to throw the ball to others. (If McGloin drops back this Saturday and still locks on to Moye - standing on the sideline in a hard boot - then Moye may have to be removed from the stadium.)
  2. Other receivers (hopefully Shawney Kersey) will get more playing time and more targets. So they will be more experienced, capable and confident the rest of the season. Live game action is the best thing for player development.
This "injury upside" forecast was not quite the case last season. Sure, when the injury siege struck the defense in 2010, players such as DL DaQuan Jones, DB Malcolm Willis and several LBs earned valuable opportunities. It was great for their personal development, and Willis in particular is an emerging asset (though it cost Jones a redshirt he could use and might never get back).

But the defense incurred an immediate dropoff in performance in 2010. It led to an embarrassing home loss to Illinois. The season teetered on the brink of collapse before the defense stabilized just enough for the Lions to win the games they should have won the rest of the way.

The keys in this situation are Moye's foot healing quickly/completely - he is needed vs. Illinois, Nebraska, Ohio State and Wisconsin - and PSU winning these next two games. The Lions should grind one out in winning-ugly fashion this week vs. Purdue. More troubling could be next week at Northwestern. Still, PSU should win both.

Then, if the Lions enter the Oct. 29 Illinois game with a healthy Moye and two more wins under their belt, they will be a better team for the experience. WRs Justin Brown, Kersey and Brandon Moseby-Felder presumably will have been the beneficiaries of Moye's absence. The seldom-targeted Kersey and Moseby-Felder should be noticeably better players in two weeks.

McGloin will have more confidence in them. And, importantly, McGloin will have more confidence in himself. (More real, internal confidence; he's mastered the external, for-show displays.) He will have guided PSU to two wins without his vapor-lock security blanket Moye.

And if Penn State needs anything right now, it's an injection of confidence in the offense.

An injury to Derek Moye is a good thing? Could be.


MID-SEASON ALL-BIG TEN TEAM: The most knowledgeable and productive person in the universe, college football information megastar Phil Steele, released his mid-season all-conference teams. He showed only modest love for PSU, in particular for Drew Astorino and Jack Crawford, and had no love for any PSU LBs, Chaz Powell, Jordan Hill or Sean Stanley, who all could make a case. Then again, it's only mid-season, so who cares? Six more games to go.

PSU players on Phil Steele mid-season All-Big Ten team
First Team:
DT Devon Still

Second Team:
DE Jack Crawford
S Drew Astorino
RB Silas Redd
WR Derek Moye

Third Team:
S Nick Sukay

Of note:

  • Seven Iowa defensive players and six Michigan State defensive players were on one of the three teams. Hard to explain all the love for Iowa defenders.
  • Iowa also had five offensive players and two specialists, giving the two-loss Hawkeyes, who lost head-to-head to one-loss Penn State, a 14-6 edge over PSU in players named. Hmm.
  • Illinois had seven players on first- or second-team defense, and 11 Illini players total made one of the three teams on offense or defense.
  • Electrifying, ultra-productive Michigan QB Denard Robinson is 5th in ESPN's Heisman rankings but is the third-team QB behind Wisconsin's Russell Wilson and Illinois' Ntahan Scheelhaase. It's a good year for QBs in the Big Ten, with notable exceptions at PSU and OSU.
  • No Ohio State players made first- or second-team defense, or first-team offense.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Ending the JoePa Era in 2011, Part II: Urban Meyer in 2012? (posted 10.10.11)

Ending the Joe Paterno Era in 2011, Part II: What would PSU football be like with Urban Meyer at the helm?

In Part I of this series last month, RFBS explained why Penn State president Graham Spanier and AD Tim Curley must begin planning for the end of the incomparable Joe Paterno Era immediately after this season. It detailed how they needed to make the move crisply, yet carefully and tactfully, in the days after the 2011 regular season ends.

This was based primarily on two things: (1) The 84-year-old Paterno is in physical decline to the point he can no longer fulfill the exhausting duties of a major college football coach, and (2) Paterno has given no indication he will step down willingly any time soon, so it will take careful planning to do it at the right time and in a manner worthy of Paterno's legacy.

The next question then is, who should be the next Penn State football coach?

Last week, a media outlet covering Ohio State reported that Urban Meyer met with Spanier and Curley on Sept. 25. Which obviously could mean Spanier/Curley are on the same wavelength as RFBS and are planning to replace Paterno with Meyer after this season.

It makes sense. If Spanier/Curley end Paterno's legendary career, they will need a coach worthy and capable of replacing him. And Meyer is the best coach available, or at least the most accomplished. He has won 82 percent of his games and has a 7-1 bowl record. He is one of extremely few with the stature and skills to fill JoePa's renowned black shoes. And PSU is one of the extremely few schools with the status to lure Meyer from his "retirement" after last season at age 46 (he's now 47).

Perhaps Spanier/Curley were only consulting with Meyer on how to go about the process of ending the Paterno Era. Picking his brain for potential replacements across the coaching landscape.

But maybe they were zeroing in on the best available coach. Or at least feeling him out.

Let's hypothesize that they get to know Meyer better, do the proper vetting and get a commitment. Then, in early December, in one of the biggest coaching announcements of all-time, Spanier introduces Meyer - two-time National Champion at Florida, and the man who reached unprecedented success at Bowling Green and Utah before that - to succeed Paterno.

In Part I of this series, RFBS said of JoePa's end, "No options will include (Paterno) having final say over his successor, because Curley and Spanier are paid to make those decisions." But the next coach (especially if he comes from outside the current staff) might insist on meeting with Paterno first to get his blessing. And Paterno might not be willing to step aside gracefully unless he perceives he has a say in his successor. And making this transition smooth, and most respectful of Paterno and his legacy, is of utmost importance and cannot be compromised. He has done far too much for Penn State and college football to have it any other way.

Meyer likely wouldn't have it any other way, too. On many occasions, including the December buildup to the Florida-PSU Outback Bowl, and most recently during the PSU-Iowa broadcast Saturday which Meyer worked as a commentator for ESPN, he has spoke glowingly of his relationship with and reverance for Paterno. He took it a step further Saturday by touting the friendship between his wife and Sue Paterno. Meyer wouldn't just want to have Paterno's blessing, he would insist on it.

What would happen to PSU football under Meyer? Lions fans will have four big concerns:

  1. The prolific arrest record of Florida players during Meyer's tenure. In six seasons, from 2005-10, it was at least 30 arrests.
  2. Can Meyer uphold Paterno's "Success with Honor" legacy by graduating his players and staying in good stead with the NCAA?
  3. Meyer's spread-option offense at Florida - and offense is Meyer's side of the ball, though he also has the CEO thing down pretty good - when Tim Tebow wasn't under center, was all too often stultifying.
  4. Is Meyer physically and emotionally up to the task, long-term? He left the Gators claiming health woes, burnout and a desire to spend more time with his family.

No. 1 - The Penn State community was aghast at times during the past decade by the number of arrests of PSU football players. It brought a lot of negative publicity, and it clearly harmed Paterno's legacy.

The past few years - knock on wood - off-field problems are down. Whether that's a concerted effort by the coaches, players and administration, or whatever, it's important: If arrests and misbehavior had continued at the high rate, it would have lent credence to the notion Paterno had lost touch, lost control and lost his clout. He might not have made it this far.

No one wants a return to those woes. You can be sure this will be discussed at length between Spanier/Curley and Meyer. The onus is on Meyer and his staff to investigate recruits more closely and monitor them better once on campus. It's impossible to eliminate off-field problems, but it is important to minimize them. Meyer failed in that regard at UF. Which doesn't mean he would fail again, but it is definitely a cause for concern. Meyer bristled at news reports that his Florida players were renegades, and he got testy with reporters who questioned him about it. If he coaches again, he seems very likely to get a better grasp on off-field behavior.

No. 2 - Meyer is a very aggressive recruiter, and it was one of the keys to his success at Florida. Public perception - and proven fact in many instances - is that pretty much everyone in the SEC is cheating (except for Vanderbilt) and either has been nailed by the NCAA, or will be nailed. Meyer skated by without major incident. Penn State would not tolerate NCAA violations. PSU's status, along with Stanford, as the only BCS schools to never have incurred NCAA sanctions is gleaming badge of honor.

Meyer would have to toe the line. Could he do so? The infrastructure obviously already is in place at PSU. Clearly the boosters are well informed and monitored by PSU compliance, as are the players. The current coaching staff obviously is playing by the rules too, and some of those coaches might be retained. This will be another lengthy discussion between Meyer and PSU officials - there is no gray area on this one. Meyer recognizes this and would not want to tarnish his and Paterno's legacy by bringing shame upon the school. RFBS expects Meyer would not incur NCAA troubles.

As for the graduation rate and commitment to molding as many true student-athletes as possible, Meyer would be hard-pressed to live up to Paterno's exalted standards. Who could? But he'd have one big thing going for him: The Paterno Way has been ingrained in Happy Valley since the 1966 season. You don't change a 46-year policy overnight. It's part of the DNA of the program.

No. 3 - Meyer's offense at Florida was awful last season. It wasn't even good during the first National Championship season, 2006 (it just looked good in the title game mugging of Ohio State). It takes the right QB - obviously Tebow was the man, and having Percy Harvin didn't hurt - and a little seasoning to work properly. And even then it can look ungainly at times. It's a grind, for the most part. But Meyer is completely committed to it. In fact he thinks his offense is meant for a school like Penn State, as he recently labeled his version of the spread as a Big Ten-appropriate spread offense. But it must have the right quarterback, and neither Matt McGloin nor Rob Bolden are that guy. Kevin Newsome would have been that guy, but he transferred (Newsome was reminiscent of Meyer's first quarterback at Bowling Green, ultra-productive Josh Harris). Either Paul Jones, incoming recruit Skylar Mornhinweg, or a new, Meyer-recruited QB would start for PSU next season.

No. 4 - Meyer resigned twice from UF, just in the last two years, citing health issues, burnout and a desire to spend more time with his family. Is he really ready to resume one of the toughest jobs in America - head football coach at football factory that demands wins and 100,000 plus in the seats and high graduation rates and no NCAA violations and minimal player off-field shenanigans? Only Meyer knows, but there certainly is reason to be skeptical. Meyer mailed it in his final season at UF. He was not the same coach. And that was just last year. Is he ready to dial it up again, full-bore, so soon? Only Meyer and his physician know the answer. Also worth noting is that Meyer's approach might not be designed for the long haul. As a motivator, he's a little gimmicky, schtick-ish. A veteran beat reporter at Florida when Meyer arrived predicted his style wouldn't last much more than a few years before it lost effect. After five successful seasons, the Gators incurred a big decline under Meyer in 2010.

One other possible hang-up with Meyer: $$$$$. The price tag for the highest paid college coaches is ridiculous, and Spanier has said PSU will not pay top dollar for its next coach. He firmly believes the Mack Browns and Nick Sabans of the world are way overpaid (Saban reportedly earns in excess of $6 million annually, Brown more than $5 million). Which means Spanier believes Meyer was overpaid, too. Plus, Spanier has gotten away with paying Paterno far below market value for many years.

Spanier is looking to pay the next PSU coach about $1.5 - $2 million annually, which is probably about half of what Meyer could earn elsewhere. Spanier likely would have to be creative with Meyer's contract, adding value in non-financial ways, and Meyer would have to be satisfied with well under his market value for the chance to coach Penn State.

The bottom line? Meyer is no JoePa, but who is? Jim Tressel, sullied as his name now is, probably is a better comparison to Meyer as a football coach, but without the sheer stupidity and denial Tressel displayed while (not) dealing with off-field issues. And Meyer had a better knack for coaching big games. Winning like Tressel in the regular season and JoePa in the bowls while steering a steady ship off the field would be a best-case scenario. And it's achievable for Meyer - if he's truly physically and emotionally ready for job.

Meyer likely would keep some of Paterno's assistants. Two who definitely would not make the transition are the coordinators: OC Galen Hall would retire, because this is Meyer's offense, even if he does have a de facto offensive coordinator, and Hall is getting old; and DC Tom Bradley, who would take a head coaching job or defensive coordinator position elsewhere. Bradley likely would bring a few PSU assistants with him if he got a good enough head job.

5.5 years - that's the over-under on how long Meyer would last before he succumbed to the same issues he did at Florida. He'd win couple of Big Ten titles and go to a couple of BCS bowl games (or perhaps get PSU into the first-ever Division I playoff in 2016? RFBS can dream ... ) and keep the program, by and large, out of trouble and graduating players. For perhaps five years. Which sounds a lot like PSU football from 2005-09, when the Lions were 51-13.

Which isn't such a bad thing, is it?

And then in late 2016, PSU can introduce Meyer's successor ... Jay Paterno.

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Reinventing the Red Zone Metric (posted 10.11.11)

Reinventing the Red Zone Metric


a.k.a. Yes, We Can Make the 2011 PSU Offense Look Even More Miserable ...

or Surely Someone Somewhere Has Come Up With This Idea Already, Why Is It Not Universally Popularized?


For years, RFBS has been frustrated by how incomplete standard red zone statistics are.

For example, when the television graphic flashes a red zone statistic, typically it looks something like this: Team BlahBlah in red zone: 24 of 28 (85.7 percent)

This is followed by the announcer (insert voice of Brent Musberger) saying something like: "Team BlahBlah now is in the red zone, and as you can see they've been very successful there this season with an 85.7 success rate. Which ranks third in the Big Ten."

Moments later the color commentator (Herbstreit?) says something like: "But of those 24 scores, 10 of them are field goals and only 14 are touchdowns, which ranks 10th in the Big Ten. So Team BlahBlah hasn't been very successful there this season.''

And you, dear viewer, are left with a big, huge ? in your head, and perhaps a "huh?" expression on your face: Is Team BlahBlah good in the red zone? Are they not good in the red zone? You've just been presented two sets of statistics with little context and apparently contrasting meanings.

Well, finally there is a solution to your red zone quandary. It will be one number, an easily quantifiable percentage. It's simple, and much better than what is currently peddled.

It is Ultimate Red Zone Percentage. Here's how it works:

Much like a baseball pitcher's ERA is a calculation of runs allowed per nine innings (because nine innings is the length of a baseball game), Ultimate Red Zone Percentage is based on a theoretical maximum of seven points per trip to the red zone. Because the objective almost every time a team enters the red zone is to score seven points.

(Admittedly this is one of the new metric's imperfections. Sometimes a team might want/need to score eight points, and sometimes three points is just as desirable as seven. But the vast majority of the time, seven points is the objective. Over the course of a season, such situations should, in general, even out.)

So, in the hypothetical Team BlahBlah example above, the 28 red zone trips could have resulted in a maximum of 196 points (28 x 7 = 196). Those 28 chances actually yielded 128 points (14 x 7 = 98, 10 x 3 = 30, and 98 + 30 = 128).

Divide 128 (actual points) by 196 (maximum points) and voila, you have an Ultimate Red Zone Percentage of 65.3%

There it is, the only number you likely ever need to know about Team BlahBlah in the red zone: 65.3. (Some other statistics could be meaningful, such as turnovers in the red zone, or whether teams are running or passing for red zone scores, but this is the best overall figure.)

And over time, as Ultimate Red Zone Percentage becomes the lone stat cited for red zone proficiency, you'll instantly know whether 65.3 is a good percentage or not, much like baseball fans instantly know a .300 batting average is good, and .230 is not, or a 5.00 ERA is bad but a 3.00 is good. Or a 65.0 completion percentage is good but 45.0 is not.

The formula uses the scoring system for football: seven points for a touchdown/PAT, three points for a field goal and zero points for everything else. Then it all is compressed into a tidy, singular percentage. It is a much truer measure of red zone success than the percentage currently used.

Need proof? Looking at the Big Ten's conventional red zone stats for this season, Penn State ranks 11th with 17 scores in 23 chances for 73.9 percent.

However, Penn State's 17 scores consist of 11 TDs and 6 FGs. So its Ultimate Red Zone Percentage is 59.0 percent.

Guess what? That ranks 12th in the Big Ten. Dead last.

See? Ultimate Red Zone Percentage already has proven to be a more accurate measure of red zone success. Or in this case, failure.

On the flip side, very surprisingly Penn State's stellar defense ranks 12th/last in the Big Ten in conventional red zone percentage. The 11 red zone chances PSU has allowed is the second-fewest (per game) in the Big Ten behind Michigan State, but the 100 percent success rate opponents have had at putting some sort of points on the board (TD or FG) leaves Penn State No. 12 in red zone defense in the 12-team league.

Yes, incredibly, by conventional measures the Penn State offense has been better than the Penn State defense in the red zone this season.

That alone tells you the statistic needs an overhaul.

Ultimate Red Zone Percentage corrects that deficiency. With 6 TDs and 5 FGs among those 11 scores allowed, the PSU defense's Ultimate Red Zone Percentage is 79.2 percent, which moves the Lions up to 10th in the league. And they would be even higher except PSU's opponents have been perfect on FGs in the red zone (5-of-5), while Northwestern's and Nebraska's opponents have each missed two red zone FG attempts. Which is one of the luck elements in red zone defense.

So there you have it, the reinvention of the red zone metric - Ultimate Red Zone Percentage. Someday, hopefully soon, it will be the universally accepted No. 1 red zone statistic.

Just remember you read it here first.

Unless of course you already read it somewhere else.

Monday, October 10, 2011

PREVIEW: Oct. 15 - Purdue at PSU, a.k.a. Winning Ugly in 2011

PSU Football 2011 - Oct. 15 - Week 7 - Purdue (3-2, 1-0) at Penn State (5-1, 2-0)

At this point in the season it is perfectly clear Penn State's focus needs to be on mastering the art of winning ugly. Because the Lions aren't winning any other way.

So we're sending the team to RFBS School this week for a graduate level crash-course, "Winning Ugly 101: The Evolution of Penn State Football in 2011"

Here's how PSU can improve it's winning ugly ability:

OFFENSE
Objectives - minimize turnovers, emphasize the run game, hit occasional chain-moving, play-action passes, improve in the red zone.

Going with Matt McGloin exclusively at QB will aid in this process (Rob Bolden, unfortunately, has totally lost his confidence). One thing McGloin does well is play-action passes. Of course, one of many things he doesn't do too well is minimize turnovers. His interceptions come in two forms: locking onto the primary receiver for far too long and then trying to throw it to him anyway; or simply an inaccurate throw, such as the abjectly horrifyingly bad one to Derek Moye in the end zone vs. Iowa, a great idea executed poorly if there ever was.

Play-calling in the red zone needs to improve dramatically: Lobs to Moye and Justin Brown, fullback-led running plays, play action passes to the TE and FB, and run-pass option QB rollouts. Please.

McGloin is the key. The PSU offense, with its adequate running game, has the other tools necessary to win ugly.


SPECIAL TEAMS
Objectives: no turnovers or big plays allowed, make all field goals that should be made (anything inside 45 yards), and STOP PUNTING THE BALL INTO THE END ZONE.

PSU has shown significant improvement since a poor start of the season in those first two objectives. Objective No. 3 continues to kill field position. Punter Anthony Fera delivered three more into the end zone vs. Iowa.

Fera inexplicably never tries to angle his boots toward the sideline. He keeps it middle of the field and counts on hitting the punt exactly the right distance, the ball bouncing properly, and his teammates downing the punt. It is a strategy which has failed miserably. Why not use the sideline? Especially since PSU is having no success the other way.

An essential component of winning ugly is winning field position, and Fera is costing PSU 25-plus yards of field position each game with dumb punting. Whichever coach is in charge of punting and punt coverage needs to get with Fera and the coverage unit and get this fixed, pronto.

Fera has had eight of his 23 punts reach the end zone for touchbacks, 34.8 percent.

Three Big Ten teams chosen at random - Michigan, Michigan State and Northwestern - have the following punting stats:
  • Michigan - 17 punts, 0 touchbacks.
  • Michigan State - 19 punts, 2 touchbacks.
  • Northwestern - 23 punts, 3 touchbacks.
That's a combined 59 punts with 5 touchbacks, 8.5 percent. Penn State must improve dramatically in this area.

DEFENSE
Objectives: Not much needs to be said here. These guys are getting it done. Some tough tasks are ahead, with resourceful Dan Persa rejuvenating the Northwestern attack, Illinois operating at a high level and Wisconsin in the midst of its world conquest this season. It will be interesting to see how much blitzing the normally non-blitzing Lions do since LB Gerald Hodges suddenly emerged as a top-shelf pass rusher.


COACHING
Objectives: PICK A QB (please), manage the team through the transition from two QBs to one, better red zone play-calling, change punting/coverage tactics.

Play-calling and punting were addressed earlier. As for the QB, it has to be McGloin, right? Can they drag this on another week (or - egads - even longer)? If/when McGloin is anointed - a "he-didn't win-it-the-other-guy-lost-it" decision if there ever was - Bolden and his supporters will need to be massaged, so they don't fracture the locker room or become a distraction.


WHAT'S PURDUE GOT?: Not that much. Then again, neither did Indiana, and that almost turned into a disaster. The Boilermakers demolished reeling Minnesota last week 45-17 after staking a huge early lead; they lost to Notre Dame 38-10 and at Rice 24-22; and defeated Middle Tennessee St 27-24 and SE Missouri St 59-0. Purdue's best assets might be its specialists, as kicker Carson Wiggs has a cannon and punter Cody Webster leads the Big Ten with a 48.1 avg.

BELIEVE IT OR NOT: A share of first place in the Leaders Division is a stake.

THE RANKINGS: The Massey Ratings, a composite ranking of dozens of computers and polls, has PSU at No. 23 and Purdue No. 76.

VEGAS SAYS: PSU is favored by 13, with an over-under of 39.5. Meaning PSU should win by a score of 26.25 to 13.25.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Winning Ugly, 2011, baby! PSU needs to pound out another victory against an inferior opponent. By minimizing mistakes in all facets, and being sound and opportunistic on defense, the Lions will improve to 6-1, 3-0 in the Big Ten before the schedule ratchets up.